Civ 6 keep or raze city – In the grand strategy game Civilization VI, players face the crucial decision of whether to keep or raze conquered cities. This choice has profound implications, affecting everything from resource management to strategic positioning. This article will delve into the complex factors that influence this decision, providing insights and guidelines to help players navigate the complexities of city management in Civ VI.

When evaluating a city’s worth, location is paramount. Cities situated near valuable resources, such as food, production, or strategic resources, offer significant advantages. Population size and infrastructure development also play a role, as larger cities with more buildings provide more benefits.

However, these factors must be weighed against the costs of city maintenance, including unit upkeep and building construction.

City Evaluation

When deciding whether to keep or raze a city in Civ 6, it is important to evaluate its overall value and strategic significance. Factors to consider include:

• Location:Cities located near resources, trade routes, or natural wonders have higher potential value.
• Resources:Cities with access to valuable resources, such as luxury resources or strategic resources, can provide significant economic benefits.
• Population:Cities with a large population can produce more units, buildings, and resources, but they also require more food and housing.
• Infrastructure:Cities with well-developed infrastructure, such as roads, districts, and wonders, can provide bonuses to production, science, culture, and other yields.

Economic Considerations

Keeping a city can have significant economic implications:

• City maintenance:Cities require resources to maintain their population, build units, and construct buildings.
• Unit upkeep:Units stationed in or produced by a city consume gold each turn, which can drain a player’s economy.
• Building construction:Building new districts, wonders, and other structures requires significant production resources, which can slow down a player’s technological progress.
• Population growth:As a city’s population grows, it requires more food and housing, which can strain a player’s resources.

Strategic Considerations

The location of a city can have a major impact on military operations, trade routes, and diplomatic relations:

• Military operations:Cities can serve as strategic strongholds, providing defense against enemy attacks and a base for launching military campaigns.
• Trade routes:Cities located on trade routes can generate significant income and resources.
• Diplomatic relations:Cities can influence diplomatic relations with other civilizations, providing opportunities for alliances, trade agreements, or even war.

Long-Term Impact, Civ 6 keep or raze city

The decision to keep or raze a city can have long-term consequences:

• Victory conditions:Cities are required for many victory conditions, such as Domination, Culture, and Religious.
• Environmental impact:Razing a city can have negative environmental consequences, such as pollution or deforestation.
• Loyalty:Razing a city can damage the loyalty of nearby populations, making it more difficult to maintain control over the surrounding area.

Popular Questions: Civ 6 Keep Or Raze City

What factors should be considered when evaluating a city’s worth?

Location, resources, population size, and infrastructure development.

How do the costs of city maintenance impact the decision-making process?

High maintenance costs can strain a player’s economy, making it difficult to support a large number of cities.

Can razing a city be used as a strategic tactic?

Yes, razing a city can deny resources to opponents, create defensible borders, or disrupt enemy supply lines.